You cannot view this unit as you're not logged in yet.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
User Name:
User email:
| Module 1 | Introduction to Forex Trading | - |
| Unit 1 | What is Trading? | |
| Unit 2 | The Advantages of Trading Forex? | |
| Unit 3 | Who Trades the Forex Market? | |
| Unit 4 | Secrets Of A Professional Trader | |
| Unit 5 | 12 False Trading Myths You Need To Know | |
| Module 2 | The Financial Market | - |
| Unit 1 | How Do Traders Analyse the Market? | |
| Unit 2 | The Relationship Between Human Behaviour and the Financial Market | |
| Unit 3 | What is Price Action? | |
| Unit 4 | Introduction to Trading Charts | |
| Unit 5 | Introduction to Technical Indicators | |
| Module 3 | Becoming a Trader | - |
| Unit 1 | This is Business | |
| Unit 2 | Six Critical Elements of Trading/Investing | |
| Unit 3 | How to Become a Profitable Trader? | |
| Unit 4 | Why Is Trading Psychology Important? | |
| Unit 5 | How to Choose Your Trading Broker? | |
In an earlier unit, oscillators were described as “leading indicators.” However, a couple times now, including this unit, it’s said that “price action” is the only leading indicator. Is there a discrepancy?
Hey Lynndal,
Great question. Let me explain a little more.
In earlier unit, I was describing the TYPES of Technical Indicators – mainly Leading Vs Lagging. Hence, oscillators are categorised as the leader between the two.
In this section, Price Action is described as an advance SIGNAL (as opposed to a leading Technical Indicator) and it is superior compared to ANY type of indicators.
Hope that make sense?
Alwin
Makes sense… thanks.